Trial for convoy protest organizers not about political beliefs: Crown


Article content

Tamara Lich and Chris Barber are not on trial for their political beliefs against COVID-19 public health orders, but for the means the two convoy protest organizers used in trying to end them, a Crown prosecutor argued Tuesday.

Tim Radcliffe used his opening remarks at the start of their 16-day trial to paint a picture of Lich and Barber at the heart of the protest that gridlocked downtown Ottawa near Parliament Hill for three weeks in January and February 2022, until police moved in to clear the streets.

Advertisement 2

Article content

Article content

“This occupation was anything but peaceful,” Radcliffe told the court.

Lich, who hails from Medicine Hat, Alta., and Barber, who is from Swift Current., Sask., were part of the original group that mobilized a convoy of big rigs and other vehicles to drive to Ottawa to protest COVID-19 public health orders and, more broadly, the federal Liberal government.

Together they are charged with mischief, counselling others to commit mischief, intimidation and obstructing police. Barber, who owns a trucking company in Saskatchewan, is also charged with counselling others to disobey a court order that banned loud honking in the city’s downtown core.

In a signed admission to the court, Lich and Barber acknowledged the actions of “certain individuals” interfered with the lawful use, enjoyment and operation of property and businesses in downtown Ottawa during the protest.

In a separate document signed by Lich and Barber, Lich admitted that she was a leader, organizer and authorized spokesperson for the convoy protest.

Both appeared in court and sat quietly on a front bench as Crown presented its opening arguments.

Advertisement 3

Article content

In laying out the Crown’s position, Radcliffe told the court that Lich and Barber not only counselled people to come to Ottawa, but to remain there, using what the lawyer called their “infamous ’hold the line’ rallying call.”

He said the pair also “pressured decision-makers” and exerted “control and influence” when it came to where vehicles were parked, all in the name of achieving the political purpose of ending pandemic health orders, such as vaccine mandates.

“This case is not about their political views,” Radcliffe told the court. “What’s at issue … is the means they employed, not the ends.”

He went on to say Lich and Barber did not just “hold the line” during those three weeks in Ottawa, but they “crossed the line, and in so doing they committed multiple crimes.”

The Crown hopes to establish that Barber and Lich worked together in lockstep, so that evidence against one of them will apply to both.

About 50 people, including roughly 20 who were there to support Lich and Barber, filled the Ottawa courtroom on Tuesday.

Justice Heather Perkins-McVey said she requested the largest courtroom to allow as many people as possible to watch, given the public interest in the case. She also took a moment during the Crown’s opening remarks to remind the members of the public in the room that the Crown’s opening remarks were not considered evidence, but only its perspective of the case.

Advertisement 4

Article content

Before the trial got underway, Radcliffe told the court the Crown planned to submit more than 100 pieces of evidence and call 22 witnesses, including top Ottawa police and municipal officials.

Lich and Barber’s defence lawyers said they hoped that, by admitting the protest was disruptive, they could avoid having to hear from nine witnesses, including Ottawa residents, business owners and an employee who worked for the city’s transit operator.

Earlier Tuesday, former Ottawa mayor Jim Watson, who was at the courthouse, said he expected to be called a witness, but the Crown later said he was not on the list.

Radcliffe said the Crown intended to use 50 videos, including some filmed by Lich and Barber themselves, to show they were key organizers of the movement that led to an “occupation” around downtown Ottawa.

Immediately, each of their lawyers jumped in to dispute the use of the word “occupation,” calling it “inflammatory, inaccurate and insensitive.”

“In a world where the trite, the mundane and the trivial are called ’awesome’ and ’amazing,’ it is no surprise, but nevertheless disappointing, that the demonstration of Jan. 26 to Feb. 19 in the downtown of Ottawa would be referred to as an occupation,” Lawrence Greenspon, who is representing Lich, said Tuesday.

Advertisement 5

Article content

He suggested to the court “occupation” was not a fitting word to use, given past and present examples of people living under such conditions.

Diane Magas, who is representing Barber, also requested to the court that the Crown not use the term.

Ottawa police Const. Craig Barlow was the Crown’s first witness on Tuesday. While he was on the stand, court viewed a 12-minute compilation video of scenes from the convoy protest he compiled to introduce the court to what life was like in Ottawa at the time. Most of it was taken from police body cameras.

The sound of revving engines, air horns, chants of “freedom” and “we’re not leaving” filled the Ottawa courtroom as scenes of blocked intersections, large crowds, open fires and Canadian flags played on a large TV screen.

The video also showed a sea of protesters pushing back against police during a massive operation to put an end to the protest.

In her cross-examination, Magas asked Barlow whether he reviewed video of people hugging, games of pickup street hockey, a bouncy castle, and other scenes from the convoy that weren’t included in the compilation video.

He said he did, but wasn’t asked to include them.

The Crown also filed videos that showed protesters yelling “hold the line” as police officers in riot gear attempted to push demonstrators off the street.

In one clip, a protester says “we’re not going anywhere.”

Magas then showed another series of video clips showing police using force against protesters.

Article content


Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Join the Conversation

Advertisement 1


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here