Using abortion pills that are prescribed via telehealth is just as safe and effective as having the medication prescribed in person, the largest study of its kind suggests.
The scientists behind the study say the finding could reassure patients who are skeptical about the safety and legitimacy of telehealth abortions and help meet the growing demand for accessible abortion since Roe v. Wade was overturned in 2022. Since that 2022 ruling, the safety of pills used in medication abortion — specifically, the drug mifepristone — has also been debated in state and federal appeals courts and will soon be addressed by the U.S. Supreme Court. The new study underscores this drug’s already-proven safety record.
Medication abortions typically involve taking mifepristone and a second drug called misoprostol; this method can be used up to 10 weeks gestation, or 70 days from the start of a person’s last menstrual period. The new analysis included more than 6,000 pregnant people who underwent telehealth abortions, 97.7% of whom successfully terminated their pregnancies without requiring any further treatment.
This rate is comparable to the 97.4% success rate described in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug label for mifepristone, as well as rates described in previous studies of medication abortion prescribed in person and then used either at home or in a hospital.
Related: Chemicals in plastics and cosmetics tied to preterm birth risk
Only 0.25% of the patients in the study experienced serious side effects related to their abortions, some of which required blood transfusions, for instance. Just 0.16% had an ectopic pregnancy, which is when the fertilized egg implants in tissue somewhere other than the uterus. This is a concern because, during a medication abortion at home, this rare complication might not be recognized as it could be in a clinic and could then rupture, requiring immediate treatment.
These figures are comparable to published data on medication abortions conducted after an in-person assessment: The rate of serious side effects ranges between 0.2% and 0.5%, and ectopic pregnancy rates are about 0.2%, the authors wrote in the new study, published Thursday (Feb. 15) in the journal Nature Medicine.
“This is the largest study on telehealth abortion in the U.S. and significantly adds to the body of evidence showing its safety and effectiveness,” Ushma Upadhyay, lead study author and a professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive sciences at the University of California, San Francisco, told Live Science in an email.
The findings have “huge” policy implications, Upadhyay said. In 2021, the FDA ruled that mifepristone could be prescribed via remote consultations based on a patient’s self-reported medical history rather than on in-person assessments involving an ultrasound, for instance. However, the Supreme Court is soon expected to determine whether this regulatory change should stay, after a federal appeals court ruled against it in 2023. The appeals court also argued that the drugs should be used only up to seven weeks of gestation and only in the presence of a physician.
“This research shows that the FDA followed science when it expanded how this medication could be dispensed,” Upadhyay said. “The Supreme Court should follow suit and allow the FDA regulatory changes to stand,” she said. There are some states that already ban telehealth abortions, but the Supreme Court’s ruling would open the door for a nationwide ban.
In their analysis, Upadhyay and colleagues used data on 6,034 pregnant people in the California Home Abortion by Telehealth study. The patients received medication from three virtual clinics operating in 20 states and Washington, D.C., between April 2021 and January 2022.
Each patient received 200 milligrams of mifepristone followed by 1,600 or 800 micrograms of misoprostol, depending on whether they were more or less than 63 days pregnant. These drugs were prescribed after either a videoconference or secure text-message exchanges with a doctor and then delivered by mail.
Anyone suspected of being more than 70 days pregnant or at risk of ectopic pregnancy were excluded and asked to go to a clinic for a pre-abortion ultrasound. The team followed up with each patient remotely three to seven days after their abortion and also about one to three weeks after that.
There was no difference in the effectiveness or safety of telehealth abortions between the patients who received care via video or text messages. The latter approach could make medication abortion more accessible to people without strong internet connections, the team wrote in the paper. Of course, that still leaves telehealth abortions inaccessible to those who don’t own electronic devices or who are beyond the first trimester of pregnancy, the authors acknowledged.
The study didn’t directly compare telehealth medication abortions to in-person abortions but rather looked at data available in published studies for the latter procedures. This could somewhat limit the generalizability of the findings.
Nevertheless, the study could help raise awareness of this increasingly common abortion method.
“I think there is more work to be done in making it more commonly known that an abortion can occur with medications and that a telehealth abortion is possible,” Upadhyay said.
This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.